Lenovo 11A9000EMZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 11A9000EMZ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3148
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200824
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 651
70% 556 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3148) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.26.07
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 23.7
13% 17.2 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 12.4
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B7T1KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1057 1604 965 924 956 955 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 1,679
Mixed 1,552
SusWrite 1,077
380% 1,707 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.3
218% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 67.9
200% 455 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 264%
Great: 370%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 28TB
5.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 273 271 265 283 268 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 262
Write 251
Mixed 215
SusWrite 271
340% 250 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.4
193% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 106%
Great: 147%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 20TB
598GB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 375 371 383 372 373 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 307
Write 288
Mixed 145
SusWrite 361
370% 275 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
179% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 136%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback