bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory19.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 19.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory16.8 GB free of 19.5313 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 15:39
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5680
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 159
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 335
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 268GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 127 126 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 451
Write 190
Mixed 391
SusWrite 128
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 10.2
38% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 147
110% 147 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 63%
Dell PERC 6/i 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 41 44 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 468
Write 259
Mixed 383
SusWrite 43.2
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 13.1
48% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 160
122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 19GB
null MHz
3968, 16032 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback