Pegatron IPMTB-GS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardPegatron IPMTB-GS  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 12:04
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 139
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 355
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 842A) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.9
14% 18.3 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 16
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 120 133 134 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 121
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 84%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
4GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.6 2.5 5.2 4.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 1.2
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 3.7
8% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMTB-GS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Pegatron IPMTB-GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback