Dell PowerEdge 2950

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemDell PowerEdge 2950
MotherboardDell PowerEdge 2950  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20101030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5310
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 36.9
26% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 74.1
8-Core 148
13% 111 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 5/i 299GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 40 32 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.1% Excellent
Read 572
Write 84.5
Mixed 556
SusWrite 33.6
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 51.4
175% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 128
96% 128 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%
Dell PERC 5/i 898GB
637GB free
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 186 175 152 141 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.4% Outstanding
Read 604
Write 521
Mixed 561
SusWrite 158
103% 461 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 53.1
180% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 126
94% 125 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GT72U4NB1BN-3C 830B8089830B NT2GT72U4NB1BN-3C 830B8089830B NT2GT72U4NB1BN-3C 830B8089830B NT2GT72U4NB1BN-3C 802C7FB3802C 18HF25672FD667H1D6 802C7FB3802C 18HF25672FD667H1D6 12GB
667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge 2950 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge 2950

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback