Acer Aspire VN7-791G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire VN7-791G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire VN7-791G
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 08:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 476
54% 423 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Acer(1025 091D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 13.2
12% 15.2 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 15.3
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 426 431 430 436 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 424
Mixed 330
SusWrite 429
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 34.6
118% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 209
176% 253 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E 750GB
502GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 95 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 90
Write 90
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 93.9
109% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire VN7-791G Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire VN7-791G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback