Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 06:20
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 225
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 754
72% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,205
75% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1535 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.6% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 94.1
53% 76.3 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 53.1
51% 64.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 999GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,714
Write 2,975
Mixed 1,803
488% 2164 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 36.2
119% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 413
313% 420 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 413%
Amd-raid Array 1 718GB
191GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 964 476 59 292 228 329 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 703
Write 950
Mixed 410
SusWrite 391
138% 613 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 17.2
67% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 80.4
95% 160 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3000C15-8GTZR F4-3000C15-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 34.6
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 28.4
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback