Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 172% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 201% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '21 at 08:59
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 84 1-Core 160 2-Core 318 100% 187 Pts	4-Core 637 8-Core 1274 113% 956 Pts	64-Core 2,402 149% 2,402 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE A018) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Lighting 246 Reflection 207 Parallax 244 201% 232 fps	MRender 286 Gravity 238 Splatting 162 180% 228 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$67 5,838 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 464 417 424 419 486 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 486 Mixed 391 SusWrite 448 103% 459 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 48.1 166% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 279 228% 326 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 121%
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 44GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 179 181 184 184 183 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 476 Write 186 Mixed 225 SusWrite 182 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 37.8 139% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 168 146% 219 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 26GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 513 Write 479 Mixed 383 102% 459 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 45.6 160% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 350 267% 362 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Kingdian S280-120GB 120GB 1,133 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 5GB free Firmware: P0901A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 494 Write 362 Mixed 356 90% 404 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 40.4 139% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 214 178% 256 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 112 109 112 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 82.3 Write 104 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 108 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.6 229% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3200C16-8GTZR 24GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3066, 3066, 3066 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.7% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 21.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 23.8 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,063

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)