Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '21 at 05:10
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 87.1 1-Core 101 2-Core 175 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 782 70% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,109 69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	48.7% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 59.6 49% 59.6 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 59.6 49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 363 391 393 400 400 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 434 Mixed 356 SusWrite 383 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 37.5 128% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 238GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 376 397 401 401 401 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 438 Mixed 351 SusWrite 388 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 74 4K Mixed 38.4 132% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 350 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 238GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 375 398 401 400 401 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 431 Mixed 356 SusWrite 388 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 41.7 137% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3300 C16 8x4GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	114% Outstanding	MC Read 49.3 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 42.1 128% 44.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 21.6 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 156%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $91Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $112Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,403

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16