Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90DA00A7SP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90DA00A7SP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160121
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 388
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3E56) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD12S 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 406 389 390 387 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 263
Mixed 340
SusWrite 393
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 43.3
152% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 205
174% 252 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
297GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 77 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 80.1
Write 81
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 78
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90DA00A7SP Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 90DA00A7SP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback