Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

Performance Results


Gaming 191% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 217% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '21 at 19:49
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Memory 81 1-Core 160 2-Core 319 100% 187 Pts	4-Core 619 8-Core 1181 107% 900 Pts	64-Core 2,204 136% 2,204 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 403F) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4755 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Lighting 286 Reflection 258 Parallax 289 233% 278 fps	MRender 325 Gravity 240 Splatting 178 195% 248 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99 52,084 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 884GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1709 1733 1732 1757 1760 1756 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	284% Outstanding	Read 1,226 Write 1,722 Mixed 1,293 SusWrite 1741 339% 1,495 MB/s	4K Read 54.1 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 78.7 281% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 710 DQ Write 1184 DQ Mixed 883 687% 926 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 284% Great: 299%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB 4,401 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3.5TB free Firmware: KQ000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 179 181 182 183 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 183 Write 176 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 181 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 0.6 8% 3.57 MB/s	DQ Read 1.5 DQ Write 8.4 DQ Mixed 1.9 2% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB 1,635 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 46.5 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 37 119% 41.7 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 35.3 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4S Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 126%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 119%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	67x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	34x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	32x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	22x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $148Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	18x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $734

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16