Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170606
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '17 at 21:59
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$120 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 226 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 722 72% 587 Pts	64-Core 912 56% 912 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled) 2,533 User benchmarks, average bench 50% AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 59.5 Parallax 84.9 55% 70.5 fps	MRender 59.2 Gravity 58.2 Splatting 77 54% 64.8 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 958GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,562 Write 1,245 Mixed 1,272 302% 1,360 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 14.7 76% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 72.1 82% 140 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 188%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EAVS-00D 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 186GB free Firmware: 01.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 32% Great: 45%
Amd-raid Array 2 599GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 114GB free Firmware: 8.1 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 169 Write 111 Mixed 139 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 4.12 4K Mixed 1.14 250% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C10 2x8GB 1,021 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 26.1 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 22.3 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	27x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	19x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	20x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	11x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX300 SATA M.2 1TBCrucial $65Bench 90%, 6,111 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	5x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16