Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 204
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 524
51% 418 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 20.5
12% 33.2 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 13.5
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 47 39 63 53 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 97.8
Write 130
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 49.7
69% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 78.C2GF4.AU30B 12GB
3200, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 20.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback