Biostar Z270GT4

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar Z270GT4 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '21 at 05:06
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 58.3 1-Core 25 2-Core 50.1 31% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 83.7 8-Core 118 13% 101 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 39 Parallax 37 28% 37 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 26.7 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 290 298 296 286 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 425 Write 372 Mixed 379 SusWrite 271 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 28.4 90% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 181 134% 178 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$79 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 579GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 152 151 154 153 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 151 Write 119 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 151 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 213GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 90 91 91 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50% Average	Read 84.3 Write 79.7 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 89.6 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 70%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 103GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 37 36 38 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 27.7 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 35.7 44% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB 5,345 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270GT4 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar Z270GT4

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	9x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	5x
Core i5-7600Intel $89Bench 72%, 39,689 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	4x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	6x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	2x

RAM
CMK16GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 32GBUnknownBench 60%, 14 samples	8x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 3x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 265 samples	4x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 51,435 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16