Lenovo 20278

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemLenovo 20278  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20278 QB0
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 21:40
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 166
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 237
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5024) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 6.3
3% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTS430S 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427DNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 422 410 422 434 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 430
Mixed 424
SusWrite 424
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 45
153% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 221
184% 260 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
114GB free
Firmware: GH2OA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 115
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 68.2
56% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 19.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20278 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20278

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback