Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-6Y30 5,480 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 64 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 113 50% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 170 24% 175 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 380E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4627 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 3.3 4% 3.77 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB 9,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: G876201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 162 119 108 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 450 Write 175 Mixed 220 SusWrite 138 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 32.6 115% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 170 144% 215 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EE-EGCF 2x4GB 953 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 18.3 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	18x

SSD
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	7x
RTHMB256VBM4MWDL 256GBBench 55%, 130 samples	6x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	2x

RAM
K4E6E304EE-EGCF 2x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 953 samples	11x
2x4GBElpidaBench 51%, 4,362 samples	5x
K4E8E304EE-EGCF 2x2GBSamsungBench 56%, 146 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16