MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C13
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 751
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 52.7
50% 58 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 53
46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VR-128GB 120GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 59 103 64 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 452
Write 359
Mixed 300
SusWrite 69.4
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 18.2
118% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 74.8
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 1
56% 127 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
266GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 104 104 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 103
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13) Builds (Compare 879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback