Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 01:28
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 416
54% 405 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 85.8
78% 91.1 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 81.9
Splatting 73
71% 89.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 426
Write 88
Mixed 117
SusWrite 80
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 25
104% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 115
90% 126 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
451GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 148 148 147 145 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 135
Write 50
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 145
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback