Asus B75M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B75M-A  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 342
44% 334 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 134 72 74 73 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 436
Write 336
Mixed 321
SusWrite 95.6
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 27.4
106% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 189
171% 257 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
73GB free
Firmware: 3.ADJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 59.7
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 56.9
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 40%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
785GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 102 100 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 99.9
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB9N-CG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback