Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 07:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 97
2-Core 188
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 269
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
PowerColor(148C 3000) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 54.4
34% 44 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 24.3
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07542
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 419 422 432 431 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 466
Mixed 421
SusWrite 425
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 40
140% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 293
216% 283 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 99%
Transcend TS480GMTS820S 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 409 415 421 420 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 495
Write 416
Mixed 377
SusWrite 412
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 23.6
119% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 33.4
72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Innostor Innostor 64GB
56GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 15 17 16 14 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 33
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 16.4
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
51% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4G-2666-CL191 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 22.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback