Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 10 '17 at 22:58
Run Duration435 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 389
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 118
Parallax 99.7
93% 110 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 105
Splatting 104
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
206GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 117
Mixed 82.6
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.22
66% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
122GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 120
Write 155
Mixed 126
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
70GB free
Firmware: BBCOC33P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 48.1
Write 40
Mixed 41.5
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.25
67% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 30%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
55GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 65
Write 43.7
Mixed 61.2
43% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.24
62% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HCC545050A7E380 500GB
21GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 60.5
Mixed 67.2
46% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.16
48% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 58%
ST332041 8AS 320GB
84GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 105
Write 98.6
Mixed 92.6
126% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 44%
ST375052 5AS 750GB
56GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 101
Write 90.8
Mixed 102
126% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.32
57% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 49%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
33GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 87.9
Write 110
Mixed 84.3
123% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.24
41% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 48%
MAXTOR S TM3250310AS 250GB
30GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 80.8
Write 74.3
Mixed 29.1
73% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.12
15% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 32GB
15GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21.8
Write 3.41
10% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $157

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback