Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160525
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '17 at 19:20
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
42% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 95.1
47% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 92.7
8-Core 93
12% 92.8 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X412 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 408
Write 196
Mixed 168
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 18.4
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 43.8
62% 116 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 101%
ST320LT0 20-9YG142 320GB
239GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 27.9
Mixed 27.2
36% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 CM3B4G1C1600L11 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback