Asus P5KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5KC  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 19:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 105
51% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 212
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 33.7
20% 28.5 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 26.3
25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 159 128 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.2% Good
Read 258
Write 247
Mixed 211
SusWrite 154
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 35.6
129% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 174
131% 174 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 110%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
362GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 135 144 146 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 101
Write 119
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 133
67% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
358GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 86 88 91 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 22.7
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 88.4
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback