Eluktronics Mech-15 G2Rx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemEluktronics Mech-15 G2Rx  (all builds)
MotherboardEluktronics Mech-15 G2Rx
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 18:51
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 802
80% 652 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1065) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 93.4
Parallax 8.8
5% 36.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 11.8
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.2% Good
Lighting 83.2
Reflection 91.6
Parallax 79.6
68% 84.8 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 78
Splatting 71.8
66% 82.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
656GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 911 900 980 947 964 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 959
Write 714
Mixed 726
SusWrite 932
187% 833 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 17.2
108% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 247
220% 350 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 144%
Great: 295%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
457GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 798 803 811 856 847 841 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 986
Write 397
Mixed 669
SusWrite 826
161% 719 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 27.5
100% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 207
157% 218 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 130%
Great: 209%
Jmicron Tech 256GB
157GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 20 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.2% Very poor
Read 37
Write 39.1
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 20.9
8% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 8.2
32% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 16.2
12% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
726GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 86 46 77 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 107
Mixed 56
SusWrite 74.9
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
166% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 67%
USB30 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0127
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 35.6
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 20.9
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CD F4-2400C16-16GRS 32GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mech-15 G2Rx Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Eluktronics Mech-15 G2Rx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback