Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 18:07
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 271
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 828
85% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,247
77% 1,247 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.2% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 71
38% 55.2 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 32.4
33% 41.6 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
934GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7174
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 1354 1390 1399 1323 1442 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A4G8BAF-062E:B 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 24.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback