Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3009-A1
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 13:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 161
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 333
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8555) 2GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 29.7
26% 32.8 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 27.8
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 90 80 63 48 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.2% Very poor
Read 169
Write 118
Mixed 119
SusWrite 64.3
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 1.1
18% 8.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 14.3
22% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
39GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 70 71 71 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 69
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 69.2
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX100 S3 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback