Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	16.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	81%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 257 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 813 76% 631 Pts	64-Core 1077 67% 1077 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Gigabyte(1458 2313) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.2% Very good	Lighting 82.8 Reflection 146 Parallax 187 68% 139 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 133 Splatting 97.2 93% 116 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,699 Write 1,188 Mixed 499 248% 1,129 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 44.1 148% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 744 DQ Write 503 DQ Mixed 566 438% 604 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 26GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 97 133 172 96 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 844 Write 358 Mixed 993 SusWrite 204 134% 600 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 53.9 171% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 544 DQ Mixed 269 289% 482 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 29.7 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 28.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $199Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	353x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	125x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	69x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	75x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	57x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $872

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16