Equus Nobilis

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Equus Nobilis (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel NUC5i7RYB
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150703
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '21 at 21:39
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5557U 1,590 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 165 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 256 30% 233 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile) 5,403 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Intel(8086 2057) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 10.6 6% 7.2 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 8.4 Splatting 7.2 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron M600 256GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 211 323 280 288 265 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 365 Write 362 Mixed 171 SusWrite 270 66% 292 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 29.5 85% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 38.9 87% 179 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 108%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22ZCT0 320GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 291GB free, PID ce15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 26 24 27 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 23.6 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 24.8 33% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 2x8GB 3,237 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 15.2 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nobilis Builds (Compare 815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Equus Nobilis

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	40x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	36x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	37x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	37x

SSD
S700 250GBHP $46Bench 66%, 9,815 samples	24x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	15x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	17x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $402

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16