HP Compaq dc5800 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq dc5800 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2820h
Memory4.3 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151026
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 85.3
43% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 85.1
8-Core 85.9
11% 85.5 Pts
64-Core 86.4
5% 86.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.9 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 197 198 70 69 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 171
Write 111
Mixed 193
SusWrite 129
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 27.8
100% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 36.1
32% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48%
Great: 87%
10GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.2 8.3 8.4 8 8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
9.96% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 7.8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 8.7
13% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.8
126% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 42GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5800 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5800 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback