Powerspec G Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPowerspec G Series  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)
Memory16.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 245
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 694
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 50.8
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 64.5
41% 51.4 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 26.4
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 61 70 73 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 72.4
Write 73.1
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 60.8
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 M378B5673FH0-CH9 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 20GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G Series Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Powerspec G Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback