HP Pav Gaming PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Pav Gaming PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8433
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1278 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 1278 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 17:45
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 171
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 537
53% 434 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1390 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 27.4
16% 25 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 24.8
17% 20 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
712GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 101 131 134 133 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 180
Write 177
Mixed 139
SusWrite 124
115% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 29.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback