Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 13:24
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$74
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 402
51% 389 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 19.7
16% 21.4 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 18
16% 19 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 49 48 41 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 410
Write 57.9
Mixed 180
SusWrite 47.7
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 16.9
109% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 3.2
31% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
884GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 197 197 199 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 182
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 195
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
193GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 47.9
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 58
65% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $162
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback