Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '21 at 13:08
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 155 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 451 45% 367 Pts	64-Core 461 28% 461 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CHN-NGFFNV2280-256 256GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0802A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 169 200 347 246 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 603 Write 451 Mixed 478 SusWrite 249 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 31 149% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 381 DQ Mixed 49.6 130% 273 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 181%
ShanDianZhe-512G 512GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 82GB free Firmware: S0513B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 172 168 57 18 84 MB/s Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.4% Above average	Read 226 Write 219 Mixed 222 SusWrite 108 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 23.4 100% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 36.3 57% 108 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 87%
Maxtor 6V160E0 160GB 1,693 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 142GB free Firmware: VA111680 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 65 63 63 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 59.7 Write 64.1 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 64.1 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.3 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 11,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.4% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 19.8 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 13.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16