Asrock Q1900DC-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900DC-ITX (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140708
Uptime	15.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '21 at 23:58
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 57.1 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 44.3 28% 38.9 Pts	4-Core 91.2 8-Core 83.2 12% 87.2 Pts	64-Core 87.7 5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 120GB 1,958 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 41 40 44 56 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 111 Write 92.9 Mixed 100 SusWrite 50.2 20% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 18.5 65% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 79.3 69% 102 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 56%
Corsair Force 60GB 1,468 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 54GB free Firmware: 1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 74 74 72 72 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 179 Write 77.8 Mixed 100 SusWrite 73.1 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 21.9 79% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 79.4 DQ Mixed 86.5 70% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 51%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 859GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 133GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 43 44 38 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 145 Write 88 Mixed 77 SusWrite 41 65% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB 412 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 253GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 46 48 41 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 118 Write 103 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 44.7 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.3% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900DC-ITX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900DC-ITX

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	1x

RAM
SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 403 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16