TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 342
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 75%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
PowerColor(148C 2359)
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1475 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 56.4
36% 49.1 fps
MRender 46.8
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 32.4
32% 40.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 34.8%
 Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 130 137 129 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33% Below average
Read 221
Write 102
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 140
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 11.5
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 17.1
13% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 33%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 52.1%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples110x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples109x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples54x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples65x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples55x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples33x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples32x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples23x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples20x
RAM
ST51264BA1339.16FM 2x4GBCrucialBench 49%, 1,344 samples28x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples18x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback