Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 904
82% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,761
109% 1,761 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1323 981 976 982 982 827 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,001
Write 2,237
Mixed 1,753
SusWrite 1,012
394% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 74.1
261% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 950
714% 955 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 265%
Great: 297%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
110GB free
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 439 435 432 433 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 435
Mixed 410
SusWrite 436
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 41.9
140% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 174
138% 193 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 118%
Toshiba Q300 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 73 73 78 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 499
Write 428
Mixed 362
SusWrite 84.1
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 35.1
126% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 105
97% 153 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
530GB free
Firmware: 2501
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 111 109 115 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 83.7
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 110
69% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54%
Great: 70%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
893GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 106 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 105
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 104%
ST332041 3CS 320GB
298GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
Read 40
Write 36.8
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 41
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 20%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-56M0A0 320GB
243GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 30
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 37.5
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 40.3
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 35.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,695
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback