Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 17:34
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 205
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 558
55% 451 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 10.4
10% 12.8 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.6
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 69 49 39 48 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 57.4
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 109%
SD/mini-MMC/RS Card 2GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.7 0.6 0.6 1.4 6.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.72% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 2.8
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 3.5
4% 3.73 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 7%
Iomega E xternal HD 500GB
43GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 35.8
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 36.5
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB
4GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.5 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 5.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 3.4
9% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 14%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 34 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 32.8
48% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 15.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback