Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 16:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 229
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 643
68% 545 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 143 20 7 35 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 164
Write 89.7
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 50.5
22% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 18.8
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 61.8
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 107
73% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
557GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 119 120 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 129
Mixed 106
SusWrite 120
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C13/8GX KHX2666C13D4/8GX 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 32.5
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback