Intel LAPQC71B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) LAPQC71B
MotherboardIntel LAPQC71B  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 11:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 755
80% 638 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Intel(8086 2087) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.1% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 98.7
76% 97.1 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 91.7
Splatting 86.2
84% 106 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AEX pcie 512GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0609B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1448 1480 1471 1070 926 968 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,390
Write 1,416
Mixed 681
SusWrite 1,227
265% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 23.2
188% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 460
443% 689 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 220%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LAPQC71B Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Intel LAPQC71B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback