Medion AKOYA P3605 D/C493

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion AKOYA P3605 D/C493  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P2A4-EM
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '21 at 13:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 230
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 608
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX460
Elitegroup(1019 0033) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 31.8
19% 27.9 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 20
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 426 429 431 439 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,592
Write 1620
Mixed 1,277
SusWrite 510
280% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.2
216% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 698
502% 651 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 190%
Great: 237%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
753GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 182 182 183 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 154
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 179
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB
7GB free, PID 0157
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 14.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 15.5
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.8
113% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 29.2
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback