Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire X3900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FIH57
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '21 at 02:04
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 174 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 385 45% 351 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% EVGA(3842 1430) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 1.8 3% 3.77 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 206 213 216 215 213 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.9% Above average	Read 239 Write 230 Mixed 201 SusWrite 214 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 28.3 90% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 119 112% 173 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 111%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 19.2 Write 19.6 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 14.4 14% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 190% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 97%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 65GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 21.5 Write 17.4 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 12.5 23% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 13.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	15x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	5x
GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 6GBHitachiBench 31%, 138 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GBToshibaBench 31%, 210 samples	3x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $83