Asus X550JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X550JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JX
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 20:03
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 77
2-Core 137
56% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 208
25% 193 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 178D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 6.3
3% 8.9 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 330 346 338 350 351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 347
Mixed 280
SusWrite 338
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 36.7
132% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 250
212% 310 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1315 BLS4G3N169ES4.16FE 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback