Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 12:12
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 239
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 473
61% 461 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 115
Parallax 133
105% 126 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 117
Splatting 105
103% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,744
Write 4,739
Mixed 4936
1,145% 5,140 MB/s
4K Read 261
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 165
683% 190 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 884
659% 879 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 80GB
20GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 11 12 12 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 154
Write 144
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 13.1
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 64%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 456GB
79GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 11 12 12 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 150
Write 107
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 13.8
65% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 429GB
217GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 178
Write 85.9
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 10.8
68% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 99%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 32GB
13GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 11 12 13 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 179
Write 43.7
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 14.4
59% 79 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 112%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 161GB
68GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 12 11 12 12 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 100
Write 119
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 17.4
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 161GB
38GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.9 11 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 205
Write 57
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 11
66% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 86GB
28GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 11 14 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 196
Write 110
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 11.6
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 69GB
64GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 19 11 11 12 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.1% Good
Read 189
Write 148
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 20.7
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.7% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.8
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback