TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 02:41
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 210
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 396
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 80.3%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 23.5
20% 25.8 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 20
23% 29 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 20.7%
 Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 198 168 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,117
Write 745
Mixed 542
SusWrite 181
143% 646 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 72.9
254% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 716
564% 783 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑
This bench: 171%
 Great: 317%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
870GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 431 428 439 440 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 412
Mixed 389
SusWrite 426
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 48.2
167% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 113%
 Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 14.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 52.6%
 Great: 74%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,395x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples971x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample1x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples1,364x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples792x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples785x
SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples297x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples275x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples160x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples351x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples310x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples191x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback