Lenovo 20238

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20238  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 16:21
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 165
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 234
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.6
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 401 400 398 397 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 397
Mixed 374
SusWrite 397
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 46.4
148% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 306
246% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
374GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 76 77 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 71.6
Write 51.4
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 77.5
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 59%
hp x715w 64GB
52GB free, PID 4940
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.66% Terrible
Read 28
Write 21.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 15.7
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.3
71% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.66%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 20.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20238 Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback