PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 59.6 GB free of 64.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '21 at 10:46 |
Run Duration | 226 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
|
3.02%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 122 118 122 123 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
61GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 138 152 169 167 145 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
8GB free
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 48 35 28 30 36 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST32000444SS 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: KS68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 43 42 43 43 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST32000645SS 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RS0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
54.9%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
12GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB
19GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 24 24 24 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
TEAC USB HS-CF Card 1GB
0GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
|
2.66%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 319x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |