Lenovo 20ENCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20ENCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ENCTO1WW
Memory38.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 02:52
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 551
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.56
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 18.6
16% 18.1 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 15.2
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVKV512HAJH-000L1 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L0QBXX7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1133 1224 1250 1264 1226 1191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,472
Write 1,363
Mixed 758
SusWrite 1,215
270% 1,202 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 57.1
217% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 453
394% 602 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 229%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CPB 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.3% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ENCTO1WW Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20ENCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback