Lenovo 200746G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 200746G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 200746G
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080912
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 01:15
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2400
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 18
2-Core 35.7
31% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 35.7
8-Core 35.8
5% 35.8 Pts
64-Core 35.6
2% 35.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3OC64G
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.3
Write 47.4
Mixed 28.4
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 42%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
902GB free
Firmware: 1106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 17 17 16 10 8.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.1
Write 25.3
SusWrite 13.2
17% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 74%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
43GB free, PID 0470
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 20.5
31% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 18%
TOSHIBA STOR.E PARTNER 1TB
147GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.1 13 14 7.2 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Read 31.6
Write 25.1
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 10.7
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback