Asus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 22:40
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 233
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 595
64% 511 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 188 200 190 199 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 457
Write 193
Mixed 231
SusWrite 190
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 17.2
92% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 56.1
61% 103 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
207GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 92 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 90
Write 89
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 91.7
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
337GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 102
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-411.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback