Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 230 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 443 58% 439 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874D) CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Lighting 81.6 Reflection 77.6 Parallax 68.8 66% 76 fps	MRender 58.9 Gravity 75.6 Splatting 60.7 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 16 2.2 5.8 41 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 383 Write 227 Mixed 278 SusWrite 39.2 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 10.8 54% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 27.1 38% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 378GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 107 120 116 120 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 100 Write 89.7 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 116 61% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 107%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 231GB free Firmware: A50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.3 12 12 11 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 84.9 Write 10 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 10.6 22% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 21.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 18.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $88Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	727x
Core i3-7100Intel $62Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	480x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	306x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	454x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	395x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	254x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	268x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	121x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	129x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16