Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 17:48
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 168
2-Core 334
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,272
114% 962 Pts
64-Core 2,835
175% 2,835 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
MSI(1462 C725) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 184
Parallax 186
154% 186 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 163
Splatting 134
133% 167 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 75 95 148 33 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 465
Write 136
Mixed 349
SusWrite 121
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 41
159% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 192
161% 232 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 89%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
346GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 477 477 477 477 477 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 465
Mixed 412
SusWrite 477
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 48.2
167% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 111%
Great: 121%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
114GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 109 107 107 109 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 493
Write 440
Mixed 381
SusWrite 161
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 39.9
152% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 164
128% 176 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: STWS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 421 419 420 421 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 363
Write 414
Mixed 346
SusWrite 420
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 36.2
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 123
103% 148 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: STWS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 426 424 424 428 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 355
Write 418
Mixed 347
SusWrite 425
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 36
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 123
103% 148 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 89%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 200 208 206 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 180
Mixed 146
SusWrite 204
129% 175 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
185% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
16.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 258 266 266 266 266 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 172 173 174 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 98
Write 169
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 173
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
268% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 29
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 28.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $821
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback